Monday, 26 Jul 2004

Prosecution Witness #89:  Angelo Cuanang, Expert SF Bay Fisherman

Testimony

Direct Examination:  Rick Distaso

Cross Examination:  Pat Harris

Cuanang is a commercial fisherman/writer whom the Judge had no trouble qualifying as an expert on fishing in the San Francisco Bay. He described in charming detail the typical rig for catching sturgeon, the best places in the Bay for sturgeon, the seasonal effects on sturgeon feeding habits -- and how all that ties in to raising suspicion that Scott Peterson truly did go fishing on December 24.

Pat Harris used his cross examination to remind the jury that Scott is a recreational fisherman, not commercial. Cuanang noted the differences between the two -- his requires knowing everything there is to know about sturgeon fishing and Scott's does not. Even as a commercial fisherman, he also enjoys recreational fishing and often goes just for the relaxation and to get away. He also confessed that he has taken a newly purchased boat out on the water, just to get it out. When shown pictures of Scott's boat, he admitted it was prepared for fishing. Finally, Harris emphasized how much more attention Scott would draw to himself, if he indeed was at the Bay for the sinister purpose of dumping Laci's body, by having fishing gear on his boat. Recreational boating doesn't require a license, so without fishing gear he would not be questioned by a game warden; with gear he would be, if one happened to see him.
 

Prosecution Witness #90:  Brian Ullrich, Insurance Agent Principal Financial Group

Testimony

Brian Ullrich testified about the insurance policies taken out by Scott and Laci. Brian met Scott back in San Luis Obispo when the Peterson's ran the Shack. At the time the Petersons purchased their home in October 2000, Brian was engaged to one of Laci's best friends. Brian and his fiancée attended the Peterson's house warming party in November 2000 and their Christmas party in 2000. In January 2001, Brian changed careers and began working as a financial advisor. He called Scott to see if he had any interest and then both Scott and Laci met with Brian. Brian recommended Scott take out a $250K policy and Laci a $100K, both the whole life type. Laci asked to have the same amount as Scott. They also initiated IRA accounts, with Scott making a lump sum payment into his. Geragos suggested on his cross that he used money from an IRA roll-over, but Brian couldn't confirm that. The premiums for the insurance policies were $150 each, and the IRA contribution $75 each, for a total of $450 taken directly from their checking account each month.

Having purchased the life insurance policies so long before Laci disappeared doesn't immediately remove them as a financial motive. However, the total absence of any effort on Scott to claim the life insurance after she disappeared, or to even inquire into it, does. If the insurance was a motive, surely he would have researched the kind of policy he had and know that a policy cannot be collected on a missing person for a number of years. Geragos suggested it was 7 in California, but Brian wasn't certain. Surely he would have arranged her death in a way to produce a body, so he could collect the insurance. Surely he would at least inquire about payment from the life insurance company. However, Brian testified that Scott did not make a single inquiry about the life insurance after Laci disappeared.


Tuesday, 27 Jul 2004

The Jury was taken to see the boat; no questions, no testimony, just a visual look-over. 

 

Prosecution Witness #91:  David Weber, VP Engineering Lowe Boats

Testimony

David Weber testified to the stability of Scott's boat. Weber provided detailed information about the industry-standard tests completed on boats for certification. These tests are designed by the US Coast Guard and include maximum capacity -- measured in number of people or total people pounds of weight and the total weight including the gear -- and stability in worse case scenarios. Weber provided the results of the tests performed June 1, 2004.

On direct examination, the tests appeared convincing -- Scott would have had no trouble keeping his boat afloat and stable while dumping Laci's body into the Bay. On cross examination, however, the illusion was exposed.

These tests performed by Lowe have nothing to do with this murder trial. They were not performed in an attempt to duplicate the scenario that must have occurred if the People's charges against Scott are correct. These are standardized tests performed on every boat and with a marketability as well as safety purpose.

Why wasn't Weber asked to do a test that duplicated the conditions Scott would have faced? Surely a computerized program exists that can simulate the conditions and the boat capabilities. Historical data exists to provide current and wind velocities for the period in question. Laci's weight was measured on December 23. Scott's weight was known. The weight of the 4 anchors was also known. Why wasn't a test performed simulating those conditions?

Instead, we were given the illusion of such a test. The industry-standard tests were presented as evidence that Scott's boat was fully capable of handling the gruesome task. In fact, they were completed under much different circumstances.

D. Harris even assisted Geragos in driving home that point. After Geragos spent some time reviewing all of the test procedures, which essentially are performed in an indoor swimming pool and with the boat filled with water, Harris asked on re-direct: do most people operate boats in a swimming pool? No. Do most people operate boats filled with water? No.

All of the tests performed by Weber included 142 lbs. distributed evenly along one side of the boat. Geragos asked if the boat was ever tested using 400 lbs. at one point along the side. Weber replied, No. He asked Weber if he would expect that would capsize the boat. Weber replied that he couldn't honestly say.
 

Review of Gloria Gomez Interview

Jury was dismissed and the Judge reviewed the Gloria Gomez interview.

No court tomorrow (Wednesday, July 28) and on Thursday Judge Delucchi will hear arguments on the Defense Motion. Delucchi told us today that at 1:30 on Thursday he will announce his ruling.


Thursday, 29 Jul 2004

Judge Delucchi rejected Defense Motion for Dismissal, and ruled on the interviews that will be allowed as evidence.


Home | Timeline | Previous | Next