Research & Analysis : Crime Scenes
Sears Gamefisher Boat
►Indications of
Pre-Meditation
►Details of
purchase
►Pictures of boat
►1st search of the
boat -- December 24, 2002
►Boat seized and
evidence collected -- December 27, 2002
►Water sample
taken -- December 30, 2002
►Red paint
transfer collected -- February 5, 2003
►Motor tested,
items collected -- February 14, 2003
►Jurors view boat
►Boat stability
tests and measurements
►Kim Fulbright
Demonstration
►Mark Geragos'
boat demonstration and boat display
►Jury boat rocking
incident
Indications of
Pre-meditation
In his Closing
Argument, Rick Distaso argued that in November Scott was thinking about
murdering Laci, but something happened in December that "solidified it in
his mind, and he had to do it." That was the phone call from Shawn
Sibley on December 6 asking Scott if he was married. Then on December
9, he told Amber he had lost his wife. Distaso played short
section of the taped phone call between Amber and Scott on January 12, 2003,
in which Scott admitted that he knew Amber interpreted that to mean that his
wife was "recently dead." Distaso then weaves in the boat purchase
between the phone call with Shawn on the 6th and the discussion with Amber
on the 9th to show that the boat was part of Scott's pre-meditated plan to
murder Laci and dispose of her in the Bay.
The State argued that
Scott kept the boat a secret, and the Defense was not able to produce anyone
that knew about the boat or that could confirm positively that Laci knew
about the boat. Laci's visit to the warehouse on the 20th and her
request to use the bathroom of the neighboring business was discussed, but
no proof was given that Laci saw the boat on the 20th.
Details of
purchase
Shortly after Thanksgiving, Bruce Peterson
put an ad for the boat in the ModBee asking $1500. On Saturday,
December 7, Scott browsed the online ModBee classifieds (People's
178). Scott called Bruce Peterson to inquire about his ad,
and they setup a meeting for the next day, Sunday, December 8. They
agreed on $1400, down from the $1500 asking price, but Bruce wanted cash.
Scott said he would return after the bank opened the next morning, which he
did, with $1400 in cash. He had withdrawn the money from the joint
checking account. Scott gave his correct information to Bruce for the
registration.
Scott also looked at
another used boat, which was priced cheaper but was not in good repair.
Pictures of the boat
People's 108A-D provide different views of
the boat, with and without the cover in place. These pictures were
shown to Bruce Peterson for identification. He confirmed it was the
same boat he sold to Scott on December 9. People's 121A-H are close-up
pictures of the boat and scale drawings. People's 132 is the Maximum
Capacity Warning in the boat. For information on the boat cover that
was collected as evidence, click here.
  
  
  
  
1st Search of
the Boat -- December 24, 2002
Scott told the
officers and Detective Brocchini that he had been fishing in his own boat at
the Berkeley Marina that day. Brocchini asked to see the boat, and
Scott told him that it was at the Warehouse. Brocchini, Evers, and
Scott went to the Warehouse, and Brocchini looked at the boat and took some
pictures. No evidence was seized from the boat that night.
People's 70A-Z show
the pictures that Brocchini took of the boat that night, but most of them
are only negatives or distorted or inconsequential, so I'm not including
them here.
  
  
Boat seized and evidence collected
The boat was searched
and seized as part of the 1st search warrant executed on December 27, 2002.
Detective Dodge Hendee was the Crime Scene Manager. Hendee is the one
who found the yellow pliers in the boat.
Before the search began on
the 27th, Eloise Anderson brought her cadaver dog, Twist, into the Warehouse as
part of the search. She reported
Twist's reactions to the MPD in a report dated December 29, 2002, of which a
segment was copied into the People's Response to Defense Motion to "Traverse"
Wiretap Affidavits, filed October 17, 2003.
Twist-Warehouse: We then moved to the
location of the storage area where Scott
Peterson has his office/warehouse. After
the Modesto D had completed an initial check of
the area, I worked the dog. The office was
small and the dog showed no interest in this
area. The warehouse area was used to store
chemicals and Mr. Peterson's fishing boat.
Much of this area was inaccessible to the dog
and the chemical smell made searching very
difficult. The dog worked to the back of
the warehouse and into the bathroom twice with
no alerts or interest. I put her into
the boat where she showed mild interest but no
alerts. When I worked her in front of
the warehouse area she showed interest in some
containers under a small workbench. She
checked several times in each container, along
the edge of the workbench where she could reach
and along the edge of the boat closest to the
workbench. She demonstrated frustration by
barking, but did not go to her full alert or
pinpoint a particular spot. At that point
we exited the warehouse.
According to the State's theory, Scott put Laci into
the boat at the warehouse, then drove to the
Berkeley Marina, a 90 mile drive, launched the boat,
motored out towards Brooks Island, dumped her body
-- and yet there was no cadaver scent in the boat.
Drawing of placement
of evidence placards in boat

-
Item 142, water in the
boat
-
Item 143, anchor
-
Item
144,
pair of yellow-handled pliers
-
Item 144A, hair found in the pair of
yellow-handled pliers
-
Item 147, shoestring
-
Item 148, Green duffle bag
-
Item 148C, 2 lures & July 23, 1999 2-day fishing license with Ocean
enhancement stamp
-
Item 151, brown tackle box
-
Item 152, fishing pole
-
Item 153, fishing pole
December 30, 2002
Detectives took a sample of the water standing in the
boat and also seized
two parts of a fishing reel
(handle from the crank off the reel), Item 310
(Skultety).
February 5, 2003: The red paint transfer
Detective Grogan testified that investigators theorized
Scott would have had to tie the boat to something in
order for it not to capsize when he attempted to throw
Laci overboard. Grogan sent Detective Owen to see
if the boat had any paint transfers. Grogan
reported that he "found some red paint on the side of
the boat and in some of the threads of the screws on one
side where the fishing pole holder was located."
Samples were taken, as well as samples of the paint used
on Buoy 4, in the area of Brooks Island, where Gene
Ralston believed he found Laci's body in mid-March,
2003. Sarah Yoshida did the tests, and she
reported that they did not match. Grogan had
Hendee research to see if there was a painting schedule
such that the Buoy could have been painted since
December 24, 2002, but it hadn't been.
Defense 7K, taken by
the MPD on February 5, 2003, shows Detective Skultety looking for signs of
paint transfer, and Defense 7J shows the red hand truck (dolly) next to the
boat, after the boat was impounded. Mark Geragos argued that the paint
transfer on the boat came from the red hand truck. Grogan explained
that they didn't take a sample of the red hand truck to see if it matched
the paint transfer on the boat because the report indicated wood attached to
one of the flakes, and the hand truck is all metal.

February 14, 2003
The boat was again examined by
Detective Rudy Skultety.
Detective Skultety had Mr. Donabedian from
Tunney's Marine examine the boat motor, to try to pull
start the motor and to take the motor apart and take
samples of what was in the tank. Donabedian had
difficulty starting the motor and failed after several
attempts, "but eventually somebody put their foot
on the motor -- not on it but up against it, and it
fired right up." Donabedian dismantled the motor and
Skultety took a sample of the contents of the gas tank.
The motor was then re-assembled (Skultety)
On
this same date, Skultety directed CSO Lovell to collect
several items from the boat and booked them as evidence
(Skultety).
Sample from gas tank
One wooden oar
One orange life vest
Two blue seat cushions (not attached to the boat)
Three black rubber bungee cords with a hook on each end
One roll of black electrical tape
A
plastic bottle of 2-cycle oil
Debris vacuumed from the bottom of
the boat, after all contents had been removed
Jurors view the
boat
On Tuesday, July 27,
2004, the Jurors were taken to the garage where the boat was kept and
allowed to see it. They were not allowed to touch it or to ask any
questions. This viewing immediately preceded the testimony of David
Weber.
Boat stability
tests and measurements of the boat
David Weber, VP Engineering Lowe Boats, was
tasked by the State to prove to the Jury that the boat could handle Scott
having used it to dump Laci's body. Weber testified that the boat
passed the Coast Guard standard for flotation, stability, and side
stability, and had the capacity for 4 people, or 500 lbs., with a maximum
capacity of people, motor, and gear to be 680 lbs.
Weber also described, under cross, the three
tests that are done, and provided these pictures, Defense 5D.
 
 
Kim Fulbright
demonstration
Kevin Bertallato, investigator for the
Stanislaus County DAs office, involved Kim Fulbright, also an employee, to
do a demonstration showing that a pregnant woman Laci's size could fit into
the boat and not be seen. He had Kim get into each of the 3 sections
of the boat. These pictures, People's 106F-K, depict the
demonstration. The 3 pictures of Fullbright in the boat were taken at
a straight on angle with the boat being on a trailer. As it is,
Fullbright is partially seen in the 1st and 2nd photos (click to enlarge for
a better view). She would have been even more visible with the
boat in the water. The amount of space she occupied in each section
would have also made it awkward for someone to manipulate her body into
position for pushing overboard.


Mark Geragos' boat demonstration and
boat display
Mark Geragos purchased
a boat similar to Scott's and had his assistant do a demonstration trying to
dump a dummy the size of Laci and weighted down with the same number and
size of weights the State claimed Scott used. In the demo, he was
unsuccessful in throwing the dummy overboard. Judge Delucchi would not
admit the demo because he said it could not duplicate the exact conditions.
During jury
deliberations, Geragos moved the boat to the parking lot for the building he
owned in Redwood City. The parking lot is across the street from the
local FoxNews office, and word soon spread that the boat was there.
Nancy Grace called Sharon Rocha to inform her. Gloria Allred gave a
press conference standing next to the boat. The sum of the PR was very
negative for Geragos, as he was accused of putting the boat there in order
to influence the jury. However, the boat was not on the route the bus
which transported the jurors took, and neither was it in view of the
courthouse. The boat was removed the following day. Following
are pictures I took of the boat, which was turned into a shrine for Laci and
a vicious attack upon Scott.
 
  
 
The boat rocking
incident
On Monday, November 8,
2004, during jury deliberations, the 12 Jurors were taken to see the boat.
What occurred resulted in a request for a mistrial and may very well be a
reversible error.
These are the juror's
descriptions after they were released from duty:
John Guanasso, as reported by Garth Stapley,
ModBee, on March 12, 2005.
One juror, with the judge's permission, climbed
inside and shook the boat, Guinasso said.
Geragos later tried to use that incident to ask for
a mistrial. But the real buzz among jurors was
prompted by Peterson's reaction when the juror sat
in the boat, Guinasso said. "(The juror)
reached over like he wanted to see if he could toss
somebody overboard," Guinasso said, "and Scott
Peterson dropped his chin almost to his chest."
Greg Beratlis, as
related to Greta Van Susteren, On the Record,
December 14, 2004.
VAN SUSTEREN: Who got
into the boat?
BERATLIS: Well, you asked me, so I figured you know.
It was me.
VAN SUSTEREN: Oh, actually, no. I didn't know that!
BERATLIS: It was me and it was the original foreman.
VAN SUSTEREN: All right. You asked permission from
the judge, and he said, Go ahead, right?
BERATLIS: Correct. I made sure.
VAN SUSTEREN: Why did you want to get in the boat?
BERATLIS: Because there were questions about the
stability of the boat that when we listened to the
experts, I don't think those questions were answered
in our minds. We needed to have a little bit more to
that. And I climbed in the boat. You know, to
look, like everybody was saying, at pictures, didn't
mean much to us. And not being able to get in the
boat originally for some — we walked out there, we
were, like, hands off, and kind of walked around
with your hands in our pockets. And we didn't know
what we could do. And then when we got to the
deliberation, we said, you know, Can we go and look
at the boat? Can we physically get inside the boat?
And then when the judge agreed to it and he asked, I
believe, the rest of the — you know, the defense and
the prosecution, and they said OK, we did it, you
know? It was a matter of just getting an idea
of the boat. Looking at it in a picture didn't speak
much.
VAN SUSTEREN: Greg, the description the judge gave
in court is that you got in it and you rocked back
and forth or I think jumped up and down. How would
you describe what was done in that boat?
BERATLIS: We tried rocking it. One of them was
standing — one person was standing up, and another
person was kneeling. I was the person kneeling. And
we were trying to show what was the buoyancy. And
then we were also directed that realize the boat was
not in the water and that the situation, the
reaction would be different. And we took that into
account. We understood that. We acknowledged that.
Delucchi gave his reason for allowing the jurors to get
into the boat:
I did advise the jury that they should bear in mind
that this boat was not in the water as they stood in
the boat. And I also advised them that the boat
appeared -- also that the boat was secured to a
trailer. The reason why the Court permitted the jury
to get into the boat initially -- I didn't know they
were going to jump up and down on the boat -- was
the fact that the District Attorney had presented an
experiment where they had -- a representative of the
District Attorney's Office had actually laid down
flat in the boat. And I thought it was important for
the jury to take a look, see if there was enough
room for somebody to sit -- lay down flat in the
boat. That was not, in my opinion, taking additional
evidence because it was already set forth on the
record.
What Delucchi failed to admit is that the actions of the
two jurors who got into the boat exceeded anything that
had been presented during the Trial, and thus
constituted taking additional evidence. Beratlis
makes it very clear that they wanted more than what had
been provided by the testimony. Whether he
expected them to or not, they did it, and he should have
declared a mistrial on the spot.
|